Human history is replete with numerous examples of the struggle for the supremacy of power, in which clarifying the relationship between gender antipodes also plays an important role. Suffice it to recall Ancient Greece with its diverse models of communal and state structure, in which priority was given to either patriarchy or matriarchy. These clarifications of the relationship might have continued to be relevant if the primitive principle of physical predominance had not prevailed, where only the strength of the muscles prevailed over grace and beauty in family relationships.
In the context of a comprehensive consideration of family relations, it is appropriate to recall the thematic folk wisdom, which says that the husband is the head and the wife is the neck. That is, the female essence in the traditional epic is always identified not with humility and recognition of the power of the strong, but with a simple transfer of opposition to a more subtle level of motivation for actions. In this case, important decisions are made on the basis of expediency. And this very "expediency" just becomes that intellectual motive that is generated by the weak half of humanity.
Moreover, the establishment of a balance in family relationships is often associated with their fading phase, when stability is replaced by a simple lack of grounds for more heated confrontations, which are the real parameter of a healthy relationship. That is, the factor of "peace and love" in family relationships, where "silence and grace" is present, is a direct indication that real feeling is completely absent in this cell of society. After all, whatever one may say, and gender confrontation in its natural essence is based on the regular generation of such states, when a different view of the same phenomena and events causes the accumulation of tension.
Moreover, the absence of this kind of tension is an eloquent indicator of the artificiality, and not the naturalness of family relations. Indeed, in this case, one family member, by default, takes the side of the other (intentionally or due to the weakness of his own position). But then there is completely absent such a concept as "equal and mutually beneficial cooperation", which stands at the head of any relationship. It turns out that tacit consent or regular unanimity regarding any issues of life together directly indicates the unshakable priority of one of the spouses.
But it's not a secret for anyone that love excludes such painful conditions when one partner obediently fulfills the will of the other, thereby confirming his passive role in these relationships. After all, then the concept of "equality" is leveled. Perhaps because of this kind of family unions, a rule arose when one loves, and the other allows. Here we have a perverted form of the highest sensory manifestation.
Thus, for those couples who suspect something, but do not quite understand what is happening, it is important to pay close attention to the state of "peace and quiet" in their family. A real family, filled with love, will never be like a hypocritical and "thoughtful" idyll, in which there are no disputes, violent clarifications of relationships, scenes of jealousy and other attributes of hot feelings.
Only in the absence of the energy of the relationship (the format of the "low battery") is it possible to have a state of rest equal to death. By the way, any social relations are directly related to this principle (accumulation of tension in confrontation). And, given the nature of the opposite sexes, it is quite clear that the confrontation between a man and a woman should be present always and everywhere. In this context, it is important to understand that passion as a manifestation of this confrontation must necessarily be present in a love affair.
